Skip to content

Atlas

Share your idea. In order to help prioritize, please include the following information

  1. A brief description of what you are looking to do
  2. How you think this will help
  3. Why this matters to you

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

443 results found

  1. OCSP stapling support for Atlas Clusters

    What is the problem that needs to be solved? As a user (MongoDB Driver) you'd like to check revocation status of X.509 certificate via TLS Certificate Status Request extension (also known as OCSP stapling) instead of doing outgoing HTTP connection to OCSP endpoint from a user (MongoDB Driver) side.

    Why is it a problem? (the pain) MongoDB Server v. 4.4.X introduces OCSP stapling functionality, however OCSP stapling is not enabled on Atlas Clusters with MongoDB Server v. 4.4.X.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Support for delayed replicas

    It would be great if Atlas provided support for hidden, priority 0 delayed replicas. For workloads that do not need real time data or situations where data recovery is needed, a delayed replica would be the fastest way to mitigate both of those scenarios.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. VPC management at the organization layer (cross-project VPC) in addition of projects layer

    In order to match with GCP Host project/service projects mechanisms (network resource is managed by the host project and used by its service projects), which is usefull for companies having a large number of GCP projects to manage, in different business units, it could be very usefull to be able to not manage VPC inside projects only, but also at Organization layer: an Atlas admin could create an "organization level VPC", and peer it with a GCP host project, and several Atlas projects could 'consume' this VPC, by running clusters in it.
    That would permit to avoid having to create…

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Unique VPC Peer CIDR

    Prevent the same VPC Peer CIDR block, is it currently possible to have 2 projects with same CIDR block, which requires us to delete our clusters and peer before creating new clusters

    There should be a way to prevent them from having same CIDR block or the ability to change the CIDR block AFTER they are created

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Viewing Collection Pages

    Would like the option to view collection pages by 10, 20, 50, 100. Along with ability to move to (<first) (last>). Similar to mLab

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. M30 Cluster Tier option with 4 CPUs

    There is a gap in the Cluster Tiers for clients that have high CPU requirements but lower disk space requirements. We run on a M30 Cluster where we max out the CPU when running aggregations, we use little of the available disk and do not want to move to a M40.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Atlas project capacity should be discoverable

    Atlas project capacity should be discoverable. Based on documentation, it seems project capacity is dependent on various factors and can be arbitrarily increased via support request. We currently do not know how many clusters/nodes we have available to deploy in a given project and that is critical information to inform planning at scale.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Add Cluster name to process list api

    Currently the processes API (https://docs.atlas.mongodb.com/reference/api/processes-get-all/) returns only the ReplicaSet name of the process not the cluster name, while the cluster API (https://docs.atlas.mongodb.com/reference/api/clusters-get-all/) returns the replicaset name only in the MongoDB URI.

    If you have multiple clusters in the same Atlas project and you list the processes is difficult to make an association between MongoDB processes and the Cluster (Atlas UI name)

    Would be nice to have also the cluster name in the processes api

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Show index build percentage in the UI

    During an index build from atlas the only status update you see is:
    "We are deploying your changes (current action: configuring MongoDB)"

    When checking the logs of the replicaset memeber you can actually see the percentage of completion on that member of the replicaset:

    2020-11-25T11:15:44.002+0000 I - [conn12] Index Build: 54798100/206784433 26%

    It would be nice to have this percentage displayed through the UI.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Ability to schedule monthly maintenance windows

    Ideally we'd have the ability to schedule maintenance windows that are monthly. Either the option to say maintenance run on the 3rd of the month or every 2nd Tuesday. The current issue I see is that your non-prod clusters and prod clusters can share the same window and get patched at the same time, or you pick different days of the week for patches (e.g. Monday for non-prod, Friday for prod), but we risk having prod patched before non-prod in that situation.

    I realize we have the ability to defer maintenances for a week, which is great. However, we're now…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Allow customers to download Atlas BI Connector process logs (similar to MongoDB Server logs)

    What is the problem that needs to be solved? Customers are willing to troubleshoot / analyze Atlas BI Connector logs by themselves (they would like to investigate schema sampling timings, SQL/MongoDB query optimizations, connectivity issues, etc.).

    Why is it a problem? (the pain) Currently available Download Logs option on Atlas Clusters does not include Atlas BI Connector process logs.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Support for Azure VNet Gateway Transit

    Azure VNet Peering is currently very limited as access is only possible from the VNet that is peered.
    Could you please support access from onprem via private network (Express Route or S2S VPN) and Gateway Transit.
    Maybe another way to achieve the same could be via "Private Endpoint".

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Live Migrate through VPC peering connections

    Many teams put their databases in subnets without internet access or with just a NAT gateway. It would be great if the Live Migrate could be use through already configured VPC peering connections.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Include cluster node list in getOneCluster

    Include cluster node information for all nodes in the cluster in the response JSON for the getOneCluster API call. As hostnames are needed for other API calls, there ought to be a better way to get cluster node names.

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Change/Option to change Default Storage Compression to zlib

    This is a feature request to change or provide an option to change Default Storage Compression to zlib

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Allow multiple Billing emails

    Allow multiple billing e-mails instead of just one. There are multiple people in our org who want a copy of the invoices, but I don't want them sent to the entire org (which is what happens if there's no billing e-mail)

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Add support for arbiters

    We have a situation where we are required to build in an AWS region that only has two AZs (ca-central-1). In addition, there are no other AWS regions in the country (Canada). And due to our requirement around data sovereignty, we can't host this data set within a different country.

    Because of this, we can't guarantee our cluster will stay up if we lose a single AZ unless we put an arbiter in a 2nd region (since no data is copied to the arbiter). However, Atlas does not support arbiters currently. I know arbiters aren't ideal, but in this edge…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Integrated Benchmark utility for mongodb

    I would like to request a mongodb utility which can do benchmark tests and can be used by developers and DBA to test mongodb for release changes, application code changes etc. The utlity should be able to simulate multiple users and produce different types of workloads (like reads, updates, deletes, inserts etc). This would need to be similar to other nosql benchmark tool like asbench used in aerospike nosql database.
    Link is : https://docs.aerospike.com/tools/asbench

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. LDAP Users shouldn't be successfully authenticated if not authorized

    Today, if you login with proper LDAP credentials to an Atlas cluster, you are authenticated into that cluster, even if you are not authorized to have access. This is not at all how databases should work, nor is it how most databases do work today. If a user is not authorized, that connection should fail immediately.

    Allowing successful authentication, even when not authorized, can increase the security vector for ddos attempts as well as causes confusion when successful attempts are logged, even though the user was not authorized to see data.

    Please reject any non-authorized user from connecting to an…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Google Private Service Connect

    Greeting from Fivetran!

    This is somewhat related to https://feedback.mongodb.com/forums/924145-atlas/suggestions/45272014-allow-customers-to-specify-the-number-of-service-a . Having 50 service attachments is not scalable for us which requires 50 IP addresses for each PSC. We have a large customer base and having each of them create PSC would require a lot of IP addresses and would quickly exhaust our subnets.

    From the support case it seems that the decision to use 50 PSC attachments comes from the fact that GCP load balancer does not allow more than one pool of servers per service attachment and that the ports are passed through as is as opposed to AWS…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base