Skip to content

Atlas Search

153 results found

  1. Provide a button to cancel in-progress index builds

    Currently, the only option for cancelling an in-progress index build is to delete the index using the "Delete Index" menu-item in the Search Tab, or by using the Delete an Atlas Search Index API. This however is not easily evident, if users want to cancel an index build for any reason.

    Therefore, this is a feature request to provide a button to "cancel" in-progress index builds from the Atlas UI.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Ability to set a "minimum should match" in a query

    I can specify a percent of terms I want to match, for instance 100% means require all terms, 66% means, only return documents that matched at least 60% of the terms. (the default is 1 term)

    Ex for 100%

    search "foo bar"

    "foo bar" "bar foo" "bar hello foo" would all return

    "foo hello" would not

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Total Document count on Filter

    It's a very small feature but very useful with respect to use case, whenever someone filters on Atlas nowhere it shows the total number of result we got, till we didn't reach the last page so it's very useful if we can see the total number of records at least after filtering or it will be great if it is visible on each page.

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Add Atlas Search metrics into integration with Datadog

    Problem Statement,
    Atlas Search metrics (https://docs.atlas.mongodb.com/view-atlas-search-metrics#atlas-search) are not sent to Datadog (Datadog's MongoDB Atlas integration (https://docs.datadoghq.com/integrations/mongodb_atlas/)).

    Proposal,
    Add Atlas Search metrics to Datadog integration (start sending Atlas Search metrics from Atlas to Datadog).

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Allow queries with $search to be covered by the Lucene indexes without loading from disk in Mongo

    If the fields to be filtered on or projected on are all in the Lucene index, it would give the best latency to be able to return the data from the Lucene index only, and not have to separately look that data up from the Mongod

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Official React Component for Atlas Search

    One of the reasons Algolia got so popular might be the fact that they provided instantsearch.js. The library was really easy to get started and intuitive to understand.

    I read the Atlas Search's great tutorial(1) and watched the video(2) and cloned the repo FTS_MovieSearch on GitHub. They are really insightful and helpful. Yet, if there is official React component which provides some of (not all) functionalities that instasearch.js offers, that would help Atlas Search to grow.

    (I put "React" in title, but maybe vanilla JS/TS component would be better to consider)

    I used to try setting up Atlas + Elastic…

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Allow search users to bring their own encryption key

    I want to use my own encryption key so I know that my search data is encrypted with credentials I manage myself

    4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Ability to Upsert an Atlas Search Index

    Currently, it is possible to use createSearchIndex and updateSearchIndex to create and update search indexes, respectively. It would be beneficial if the updateSearchIndex allowed for upsert functionality, so that if the index does not exist, it can be created. This functionality would be useful in certain scenarios where the indexes are created (if they don't exist) or updated (if they do exist) programmatically, which have to rely on implementing a custom if-else logic by leveraging getSearchIndexes().

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Support highlights in embeddedDocuments autocomplete

    According to docs, currently it is not possible to get highlights inside embeddedDocuments, in autocomplete requests.

    This makes array of objects (embeddedDocuments) autocomplete unusable in our use case.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Add Atlas Search for Enterprise Advanced

    Due to customer/project constraints, I need to have the ability to use $search to query millions of historical data records with regex and wildcards queries at real-time, on a Enterprise Advanced environment.

    The data cannot be exported to Atlas and it cannot depend on Internet connection, so the functionality must be On-Premises only.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Allow aggregate pipeline on input documents before Atlas Search indexing

    If Altas Search allowed us to apply an aggregate pipeline to input documents before they are sent to Atlas Search for indexing, it would open up a TON of new possibilities not currently supported. We could do data transformations, type conversions, synthetic fields, etc.. I've opened up a number of other suggestions for these things, but an input aggregate pipeline could solve all of them in one "easy" solution. Since aggregate pipelines already exist and are deeply embedded in MongoDB, I'm hoping it would be trivial to implement as well. Simply pick up one or more new documents to be…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Allow sort by boolean fields

    When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to index/sort on a boolean field. I was hoping to do this with Atlas Search Sort as well, but it only supports date, number and token (string).

    While workarounds are available (using custom scoring), these are not easily combined with multiple sort fields and make programmatically building a query vastly more complex.

    See: https://support.mongodb.com/case/01169728

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  2 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. add a setting to ignore the corpus term frequency for score calculation

    indexOption:docs omits per document frequencies, but it still uses the corpus frequency.

    it would be good to have a setting to ignore the corpus frequency as well

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Atlas full text search should support searching all field types

    Atlas full text search should support searching all fields types including text, dates, numbers and booleans.

    Atlas full text search at present supports searching in text values only. e.g. Searching for "2022" will not pick up documents that contain 2022 in the number fields.

    The functionality in it's current form does not have any way of searching for a given string value (which can be numeric, boolean or part of a date).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. enable $and operator for multiple words in a search term (not only $or)

    It seems a commonly needed ability to decrease the amount of results from a multi-word search query instead of expanding it, since the default operator for every word is $or. If there could be a built-in $and option it will be great. Thank you.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. RBAC for Atlas Search

    Atlas Search Indexes can only be managed via MongoDB credentials (Terraform or API calls), with required role "Project Data Access Admin" (see https://docs.atlas.mongodb.com/reference/api/fts-indexes-create-one/#required-roles ). It would be great if we could create/delete search indexes using database credentials, similarly to regular indexes.

    Because of that constraint, we need to provision dedicated apikey for our application ; in order to create the relevant search indexes. However, providing "Project Data Access Admin" is too much of a security risk - considering the power of such role.

    Would it be possible to have dedicated "Atlas Search Admin" role which would allow creation / updating…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  IAM  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. wildcard path support for range operator

    Currently wildcard path can be constructed to 4 operator(text, phrase, wildcard and regex). Some use cases will be there to use the wildcard path for numeric which can be used by range operator

    { a : { "6578ghg" : { value : "not 55" } } }
    { a : { "9578uhg" : { value : 55 } } }

    Above 2 document if we have dynamic mapping of search index and below query cannot be used as range does not support wildcard in path:

    db.dates.aggregate([ { $search :{ index:"synonyms", compound:{filter:[{text:{query:"55",path:{wildcard:"metadata.*.value"}}},{range:{gte:55,lte:55,path:{wildcard:"metadata.*.value"}}}]}}}])
    

    Is there any plans/restriction for adding wildcard path support…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Autocomplete with `fuzzy` scores all results as `1`

    Using autocomplete with the fuzzy operator returns results, but they are scored all with the same value (1). This has been reported a couple times in the developer forum as well:

    https://developer.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/fuzzy-autocomplete-score/13341/4

    https://developer.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/trying-to-understand-atlas-search-autocomplete-result/13819

    This can make it difficult to process and rank results on the client side, especially for high volumes of returned documents. It would be helpful if autocomplete + fuzzy would support relative scoring.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. The equals operator should support date datatype

    Currently, for querying on "date" datatypes, we can only use "range" or "near" operators. The "equals" operator supports querying only "boolean" and "objectId" values, and not date values.

    If we want to do equality based matching for date datatypes, then we can leverage "range" using "gt" and "lt" to find it. However this might be sub-optimal in some cases.

    Therefore, this is a feature request for having equals operator support date datatype (in addition to boolean and objectId).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Support unstructured text entity recognition

    We have unstructured text and would like Atlas Search to detect important entities so that we can use them for relevance and ranking

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Atlas Search

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base