Atlas Search
141 results found
-
Atlas can be configured to raise alert notification when the Atlas cluster already scales to the max tier.
Atlas can be configured to raise alert notification only when the Atlas cluster already scales up to the max tier allowed. This can be help to avoid notification spams which does not require operation team actions and focus on the critical resource consumption alerts like cpu, memory, disk IO.
1 vote -
Text Analysis for Field Mappings
Show how an indexed document and query terms get analyzed to produce tokens based on my field mapping configuration.
1 vote -
Text Analysis in the Visual Index Builder
Show how an indexed document and query terms get analyzed to produce tokens based on my index configuration.
1 vote -
Synonyms support for autocomplete operator
Hi.
Having synonyms support for the autocomplete operator would be great! Is this possible?
Best regards,
Tim1 vote -
Add option for specifying OR or AND when using multiple terms in autocomplete search string
Hi.
Currently the autocomplete operator handles multiple terms in a query string as OR, not AND. That means that one of the terms should match, not all of them.
An option for specifying how multiple terms should be handled by the autocomplete operator (if one of the terms should match (OR) or all of them should match (AND)) would be great!
So having an AND handling would mean the more terms I add to the search string the more specific the results will be. With OR it's the other way around.
Thanks!
Best regards,
Tim1 vote -
Support highlights in embeddedDocuments autocomplete
According to docs, currently it is not possible to get highlights inside embeddedDocuments, in autocomplete requests.
This makes array of objects (embeddedDocuments) autocomplete unusable in our use case.
3 votes -
Add Atlas Search for Enterprise Advanced
Due to customer/project constraints, I need to have the ability to use $search to query millions of historical data records with regex and wildcards queries at real-time, on a Enterprise Advanced environment.
The data cannot be exported to Atlas and it cannot depend on Internet connection, so the functionality must be On-Premises only.
3 votes -
Additional function scores decay functions: exp & linear
Atlas Search currently only supports gaussian decay function for function scores. In 4 out of 5 of our use cases exp would be a much more natural choice.
Hopefully that is just a small task!
1 vote -
Ruby on Rails support of Atlas Search index management
Feedback from customer: "Currently we need to manage core DB indexes and atlas search indexes separately. We'd prefer to manage them all in the Rails model code but MongoID only supports core DB index configuration. We're having to use terraform for atlas search index management."
1 vote -
Allow aggregate pipeline on input documents before Atlas Search indexing
If Altas Search allowed us to apply an aggregate pipeline to input documents before they are sent to Atlas Search for indexing, it would open up a TON of new possibilities not currently supported. We could do data transformations, type conversions, synthetic fields, etc.. I've opened up a number of other suggestions for these things, but an input aggregate pipeline could solve all of them in one "easy" solution. Since aggregate pipelines already exist and are deeply embedded in MongoDB, I'm hoping it would be trivial to implement as well. Simply pick up one or more new documents to be…
2 votes -
Allow indexing of synthetic fields
In order to work around some of the inherent limitations of the Atlas Search capabilities, it would be very useful if we could define and index arbitrary synthetic fields using any normal MongoDB functions & operators. All other Atlas Search capabilities (query, sort, etc.) should support these synthetic fields the same as any other.
This could possibly be implemented with a new field type and a custom analyzer that supports an aggregate pipeline on the input document and returning the field as its output. This is just an idea, there may be better ways to do it.
…{ "mappings": {2 votes -
Sort by a specific array index
When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to index/sort on a specific array index (e.g.
foo.0.bar). I do this because the search results grid in our UI only has room to show the firstfoo.barresult, so it doesn't make sense visually to sort by additional objects which the user can't see.Since the new Atlas Search Sort syntax looks the same, I was hoping to do that with it as well, but it doesn't seem possible.
Example:
…[ { "xyzzy": "xyzzy", "foo": [ { "bar": "A" } ] }, { "xyzzy": "xyzzy", "foo": [2 votes -
Allow sort by boolean fields
When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to index/sort on a boolean field. I was hoping to do this with Atlas Search Sort as well, but it only supports date, number and token (string).
While workarounds are available (using custom scoring), these are not easily combined with multiple sort fields and make programmatically building a query vastly more complex.
2 votes -
Data type coercion when document field type doesn't match index field type
When a document field type doesn't match the index field type, it seems to be indexed as "blank" and won't match anything. Many data types are readily convertible between type representations. It would be great if Atlas Search could do that for us and would open up richer functionality by allowing us to use operators/analyzers/etc. on types that don't normally support them.
My particular use case is to allow searching & sorting on numbers stored as strings. When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to sort numbers stored as strings by their numerical ordering rather than…
1 vote -
Token filter that removes duplicated entries
Create a token filter or a tokenizer or even an option that removes duplicate words in fields to avoid misleading scoring. For example: if I insert a document with a property "Testing testing document", another with "Testing example" and a third with "Testing foo" and I search for "Testing foo", the first document receives a higher score.1 vote -
Allow comments in JSON code
It would be great if we could keep comments in JSON generated items such as indexes (both MongoDB and Atlas Search)
2 votes -
knnBeta Limitations and Syntax
I tested the new knnBeta operator today and it worked so far.
Can we expect the current operator limitations to be gone by release?
The current limitations make it virtually impossible to use the knn operator as a replacement for previous text operators (like text).
I would prefer the filter parameter to be omitted and knn not have to be a top-level operator.1 vote -
Allow indexing of only part of a collection
Would be great to be able to create an Atlas Search index that only indexes part of a collection (like partialFilterExpression for a regular index). This would be valuable in situations where a collection is quite large (which would create a lot of unnecessary overhead) but only a small fraction of it needs to be searchable.
2 votes -
Mutli-select faceting / facets should not affect their own filter field
I want to build multi-select facet without having to run separate queries to calculate bucket counts for each active filter. Described in detail here: https://yonik.com/multi-select-faceting/
4 votes -
wildcard paths in index specifications
It would make index specification easier in some cases if wildcards were possible in the paths. Yes we have dynamic indexing, but to keep the index size minimal and to be more flexible I want to index only the fields I really need. Consider the following example:
Example document:
{
foo: {
de: {
field1: 'bar',
field2: 'bar'
},
en: {
field1: 'bar',
field2: 'bar'
},
fr: {
field1: 'bar',
field2: 'bar'
},
}
}Index specification:
{
"mappings": {
"dynamic": false,
"fields": {
"foo": {
"type": "document",
"dynamic": false,
"fields": {
"$**": {
"type": "document",
"dynamic": false,
"fields": {…1 vote
- Don't see your idea?