Skip to content

Atlas Search

153 results found

  1. Ability to exclude documents matching a certain criteria from index

    We don't do physical deletion of documents, but a logical one, flagging them by setting a value for a deleted_at field.

    We would like an option to exclude documents where that field exists and is not null from the index, because they will never be returned and are only consuming space of the index.

    Currently we use a mustNot condition to exclude them, but of course they are still being indexed.

    The ideal would be to be able to define the exclusion criteria in the index definition.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Multiple Capture Groups in RegEx Tokenizer

    Currently the RegEx tokenizer only supports to either create a token from each match or for one capture group per match. This makes it impossible to reuse parts of the text for multiple tokens, for example when you want to tokenize "13.3" into "13" as well as "13.3" (our use case is searching products where we want to find a 13.3" device by searching for 13" as well as 13.3").

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Allow faceting on boolean fields

    Right now you can only facet on string, number, date fields.
    https://www.mongodb.com/docs/atlas/atlas-search/facet/#facet-definition

    I would like to also be able to facet on boolean fields.

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Duplicate search index

    I want to be able to easily duplicate a search index in the Atlas UI.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Allow retrieval of individual score from embedded document search

    When using the emeddedDocuments operator to search you get a score per document, but not per embedded document. The aggregated score is either min/max/sum/mean but what I really need is the individual score from the embedded documents in order to further filter out the best matches.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. search

    Allow scoring of individual embeddedDocument searches or allow $unwind phase before $search to enable fuzzy searching for specific embeddedDocument in array of embedded documents

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. add a setting to ignore the corpus term frequency for score calculation

    indexOption:docs omits per document frequencies, but it still uses the corpus frequency.

    it would be good to have a setting to ignore the corpus frequency as well

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Atlas full text search should support searching all field types

    Atlas full text search should support searching all fields types including text, dates, numbers and booleans.

    Atlas full text search at present supports searching in text values only. e.g. Searching for "2022" will not pick up documents that contain 2022 in the number fields.

    The functionality in it's current form does not have any way of searching for a given string value (which can be numeric, boolean or part of a date).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. .NET Driver

    It would be great if the .NET driver would support $search along with all the associated operators.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Support for OR Conditions

    We need support for matching for one condition out of several. This is an important usecase for my requirements.

    e.g. $or: [{ "airlines": "United" }, { "ticket_price": { $lte: 600.00 } }]

    Thanks!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Grouping in $search

    Add grouping capability to search so that it can be as performant as the search itself.

    A separate group stage is not performant at all and is unusable.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Provide features for array comparisons

    It would be very helpful if we can lookup documents that have certain array fields that match the provided array in the query. Exact match, Any match etc should be supported. All data types should be supported.

    e.g { text: { path: "city", query: ["New York", "Los Angeles", "Kansas"] } } should return all documents that have the city as ["New York", "Los Angeles", "Kansas"].

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Filtered Indexes

    Provide capability to create filtered indexes. This would allow creating tenant-specific indexes in a multi-tenant database.

    While the current implementation does support this feature in a way, it requires manual maintenance of such indexes as there is an implicit assumption that each tenant would have the same fields.

    Our core requirement is that each tenant can have their own set of fields. Filtered indexes would help reduce the size, hence requiring fewer system resources and possibly helping the database perform better.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Atlas Search vs find/match

    Atlas Search is currently quite rigid and is not as awesome as find/match.

    find/match supports a variety of operators that allow looking up documents in numerous ways and is meeting our requirements to be able to query using filters such as:
    in, nin, eq, neq, gte, lte, all, any, gt, lt, size
    These operators work with find/match for any and all data types including arrays. With arrays, find/match even does an exact match comparison which is one of our requirements.

    It would be great if we can combine the speed of Atlas Search with find/match features

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Support ObjectID as a datatype for search facets

    I'm really interested in using search facets to boost search performance, but one of the fields that I want to filter by is an ObjectId.

    I believe the only supported facet types are [date, numberFacet, stringFacet].

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Atlas Search on serverless instances

    Hi,

    I'd like to use Atlas Search on Atlas Serverless.

    18 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Faster Search Index Builds

    Today, my index build may take a long time (depending on the amount of documents being indexed) and I would like to see these be faster so I am able to develop and iterate faster.

    Please comment current build time and preferred build time.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Support for Index Partitions

    When I reach Lucene's 2 billion document limit, I would prefer to partition my index instead of being forced to Shard my database.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. MongoT (Atlas Search) logs available

    Provide mongot logs (Atlas Search) available to the customers to be downloaded and analyzed like right now it is possible to download and analyze mongod logs (classic db).

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Allow faceting for embeddedDocuments

    At the moment embeddedDocuments does not allow number or date faceting.

    (https://www.mongodb.com/docs/atlas/atlas-search/define-field-mappings/#std-label-bson-data-types-embedded-documents)

    In my opinion, this does not make the operator useful, since Faceting is now the standard for every search.

    16 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Atlas Search

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base