Brian
My feedback
14 results found
-
19 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
commented
It would be useful, except it seems to fill in all the fields (query, project, etc), not just the one field you're typing in. A number of times I've typed in a complex query, a project of many fields, and chose a sort from the history, which wiped out all the other fields.
Plus, if I have to go to the field and type something, I could do the typing part with a keyboard macro or paste. I really want it to just sort automatically on what I tell it to when I view a collection.
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
commented
_id: -1 sorts by created date, which is rarely what I want. I want to see what has been modified lately, even if it was the first document ever created, so updated_at: -1.
Brian
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
commented
I always use {updated_at: -1}, so yes, it would be nice to specify that once in the preferences and have it used as the default.
Brian
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteBrian
shared this idea
·
-
10 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
commented
I have a collection I work with where documents regularly have hundreds of fields. As the fields aren't shown in any reasonable order, I use projections to see the ones I want. But then I can't edit them and have to go back to doing a linear search through a few hundred entries to find them.
Brian
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Brian
commented
Agreed completely. I'm using a db with lots of interlinked connections via ObjectIDs, so I'm frequently copying an ObjectID value, opening a new tab, finding the collection the ObjectID is in (which luckily I know, but if I didn't it would be even harder), and entering a filter on the ObjectID. Lots of frummery for something that should be as easy as clicking a link on a web page.
Brian
supported this idea
·
-
23 votesBrian
supported this idea
·
Exactly what Oz says. I have some documents with 500 fields. If I want to find a specific one and edit it, I have to do a linear search through those 500 fields.