Tiago
My feedback
19 results found
-
17 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
11 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
15 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
101 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
32 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiago supported this idea · -
13 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
13 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
22 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
31 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
23 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
80 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
24 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
41 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
57 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
32 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
160 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
70 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
419 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
14 votesTiago supported this idea ·
There is a very good use case for the single-node cluster. Occasionally when we need to restore a backup (snapshot) just to get some information there, we need to provision a whole 3 nodes cluster. It becomes an unnecessary expensive operation as we don't need high availability and won't have much traffic.
The shared/free tier is not an option as it limits the storage to 5 GB.
A single-node cluster would perfectly fit this situation.