Tiago
My feedback
18 results found
-
20 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
121 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
39 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiago supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
41 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
87 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
87 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
173 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
78 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
490 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Tiago supported this idea ·
There is a very good use case for the single-node cluster. Occasionally when we need to restore a backup (snapshot) just to get some information there, we need to provision a whole 3 nodes cluster. It becomes an unnecessary expensive operation as we don't need high availability and won't have much traffic.
The shared/free tier is not an option as it limits the storage to 5 GB.
A single-node cluster would perfectly fit this situation.