Tiago
My feedback
19 results found
-
19 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
11 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
15 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
109 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Tiago supported this idea · -
13 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
14 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
22 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
34 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
23 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
85 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
25 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
42 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
61 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
33 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
165 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
73 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
456 votesTiago supported this idea ·
-
14 votesTiago supported this idea ·
There is a very good use case for the single-node cluster. Occasionally when we need to restore a backup (snapshot) just to get some information there, we need to provision a whole 3 nodes cluster. It becomes an unnecessary expensive operation as we don't need high availability and won't have much traffic.
The shared/free tier is not an option as it limits the storage to 5 GB.
A single-node cluster would perfectly fit this situation.