Skip to content

Atlas

Share your idea. In order to help prioritize, please include the following information

  1. A brief description of what you are looking to do
  2. How you think this will help
  3. Why this matters to you

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

468 results found

  1. MongoDB Connection Pool Proxy

    Currently there is no Connection Pool proxy supported by MongoDB.

    With the ever increasing use of serverless and containers, clusters will need to be over provisioned in order to account for the increased connection counts.

    A better solution would be a Connection Pool proxy allowing for a many-to-one relation for connections to MongoDB.

    In the case of Lambda, this would reduce the number of Zombie connections (Connections that have been terminated on the Lambda side but are still open on the server side.)

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Option to deploy the databases with pinned version.

    Atlas by default picks the latest patch when we create the databases for any major version. It would be helpful if the customers can choose and control the minor version of the databases(including patch version) when we deploy the cluster. For example: We want to deploy the databases with 4.2.19 but the Atlas is automatically creating 4.2.22

    This will help us identify any application dependencies on any particular patch version during our migration to Atlas, also this will help us test the patch versions in dev/lower environments before we promote the version to production.

    This feature is important for us…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Feature: Atlas UI -- Star/Favorite/Bookmark of Project

    It would be nice to be able to star/bookmark projects, so I don't have to type half the project name in every time I switch between environments--eg. like in Datadog, star a dash board and it shows up at the top of the list/without search

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. sort custom roles

    Sort custom roles dropdown when choosing to assign to a user. Currently when creating a new user and selecting a custom role, the roles are ordered by creation date which makes it hard to find when many exist.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Support exporting Custom routes

    Supporting export of custom routes with peering connection (with GCP in our case). At this point it's not possible to access atlas from our on-prem network with -priv FQDN, we would have to use the public ones by managing source ip in GCP firewall (painful on a remote workers world) or adding a Google Cloud VPN product to create some kind of vpn connection. Just permitting export of private subnets would be great !
    We have peering with other product and they support it !

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. providing the service as quoted

    Very angry and having suffered twice now through the lies told about only going to take 7-10minutes for an upgrade on y to be edging toward an hour now. Last time i have issues with a snapshot being deployed that never fully populated the DB when restored, disgrace, clients only get interruptions, business downtime and you want more money for better service to provide a fix to a problem that you created? its a joke, your company should be investigated by authorities.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Approval workflow for database deletion

    The current Termination Protection only prevents accidental deletion of a cluster. It helps to have a similar protection to databases inside the cluster.

    Even better if there is an approval workflow, in which several people must accept before a database/cluster is deleted.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Find Database on Multiple Cluster

    Enable the search box on Database Deployments to search for a particular database on all clusters under the project.

    This would be helpful when having different databases on many isolated clusters.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Implement AWS transit gateway support

    VPC peering and Private Endpoints have limitations that make them unusable in some environments. Implementing native transit gateway support would allow admins with hybrid infrastructures and strict security requirements to control routing and security at a lower level then is currently supported.

    VPC peers do not support pass through routing, so organizations that use transit gateways to attach IPSEC tunnels or other external networks to AWS are unable to access atlas servers via these peer connections.

    Private Endpoints do allow connectivity in these cases, but cause an additional layer of expense, complexity, and reduced security. First, the "user" side still…

    9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Control IP Access list for project-only API keys at the project-level exclusively

    When setting up API keys as a project owner, you only get one opportunity to manage the access list without getting an Organization Owner to modify it thereafter.

    This creates a bottleneck where users need to ask for their API key access list to get changed (or alternatively make a new keypair, and have the API Keys list cluttered).

    If a key is only being used in one project, it should be allowed by the project owner to update the access list at any time since there is no risk of it affecting the organization.

    19 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Test maintenance effects

    While Atlas provides the 'test failover' feature, this only takes effect on the primary of each shard. Customers who run large sharded clusters on Atlas require testing the effects of a full maintenance patch that would restart all mongod's and mongos's, config servers, etc. This feature is a request to improve the chaos engineering features of Atlas.

    At present, customers are being advised to change the TLS version of the cluster which could force restarts of all mongod's, mongos's and config servers. While this may be acceptable in non-production environments, it is unlikely in production environments.

    I believe there's an…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Add hint support for MongoDB API functions

    The "hint" option for Mongo Shell query/write operations is very useful when the Query Planner does not select the right index by default, or just to make sure the right index is used. When you cannot use the "Hide index" feature on the index selected by default, "hint" becomes the only way to have an efficient IXSCAN.

    However, the "hint" feature does not exist on the MongoDB API functions (https://www.mongodb.com/docs/atlas/app-services/functions/mongodb/api/). This means that no command we can run inside a Trigger can specify a "hint" option.

    I think that "hint" is a great "backup" feature for cases where…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Expose API for Self-Service Increase of the Clusters per Project Limit

    Give Atlas users the ability to increase the number of clusters they can create in a single project above the 25 cluster limit without having to file a support ticket.

    6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Memory managed on the mongodb atlas nodes

    we recently had a major outage due to OOM on the mongodb shard nodes . we would suggest help preventing this by providing below features so this can be managed properly going forward

    1. Set the memory allocated to the WireTiger Cache
    2. Configure more memory for a tier. The current tier is M50 (8 vCPUs, 32GB memory). We would like to be able to allocate more memory for M50 to handle more connections and memory use for workloads. Scaling up to M60 will double the vCPUs to 16 which we do not want. Perhaps offer tier with high memory usage for…
    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Atlas shards with different clusters tiers

    For solutions of hot and cold storage, there is at least 2 options:
    - Online archiving
    - Hot and cold cluster (using a trigger and datalake)
    But these solutions have limitations (https://www.mongodb.com/docs/datalake/limitations/)

    There is another solution: using sharding.
    We can set shards like so:
    1 shard: Data from the last 2 months -> Hot data
    1 shard: Data between 2 and 24 months -> Warm data
    1 shard: Data more than 24 months -> Cold data

    The usage pattern: 95% of the accesses/queries go to shard with the hot data.
    On Atlas, we need to set the same…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. og the size of oplog-mongomirror.bson.sz at time of deletion in mongomirror logs

    currently when we run the mongomirror with --oplog, it does the status when it is deleted.
    It will be good , to add the size information of oplog-mongomirror.bson.sz, that will help us to decide the appropriate disk .

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Deploy Custom Role to specific clusters only.

    You added the ability to deploy users to specific clusters. Great but you forgot to do it for the "custom roles". We use the "custom role" with LDAPS so we do not create a user on Atlas.

    https://feedback.mongodb.com/forums/924145-atlas/suggestions/38819875-ability-to-create-database-users-limited-to-specif

    Can you extend this functionality to "custom role" also %

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. secrets versioning for database users

    We would like to have secrets versioning on atlas end so that secrets rotation is easier - as it is a periodic procedure in most companies, would be great to refer to a new secret version of an existing user instead of recreating the user.
    also considering this is sadly not gonna be handled https://feedback.mongodb.com/forums/924145-atlas/suggestions/44283477-vault-should-return-users-only-once-they-can-be-us would be cool to make rotation easier.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. There is a grammatic error in button text.

    The button says "Do not me show again"; it should say "Do not show me again".

    Thank you,
    Alpesh

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. disabling mongo user

    Instead of completely removing a Mongo database user, its better if there is option to disable user so that if there is any untoward incident we can enable it back. After observing for some time, we can delete/disable the user based on organization requirements. Its useful in some cases like mongo db user returned to same department after some time .

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base