Add GraphQL Subscriptions
Lukas
shared this idea
Hi all,
We recently announced that we have decided to deprecate the Atlas GraphQL API, and current users should’ve received an email explaining the details of the deprecation and end-of-life plan. Consequently, we will not be adding new features going forward and are updating the status for all related feedback accordingly.
Please read our announcement in the MongoDB Developer Center for more details and guidance on the migration process and timeline. Should you have any questions or need further assistance, please reach out to our support team via the MongoDB Support Portal.
We truly prioritize your satisfaction and success, and we thank you for your patience and the feedback you have provided us over the years.
-
Tim Burton
commented
Do we have an ETA for this feature?
-
Nejc
commented
Where we are with that?
-
Dev Acct
commented
is this still planned ? we really really need subscriptions pleeeeeasssseeeee!
-
Joshua
commented
Hey guys, is there any update on this? Is this even a possibility for the roadmap?
-
Armando Marra
commented
Hi, this is essential for our new application.
Please implement this as soon as possible, thanks.
-
Surender Kumar
commented
Could somebody from the MongoDB team about the status. It is a showstopper for us. We tried to use watch() but it is unreliable and stops after sometime.
-
Jonathan
commented
Any news ?
-
Rense
commented
Yes please!
-
Ishan Jaiswal
commented
Please add graphql subscriptions and this is something which makes graphql really unique and awesome.
-
Brian
commented
GraphQL without subscriptions is just an organized HTTP.
-
Yuji
commented
No need to discuss, it's the basic and essential advantage of graphql. Needed to support the graphql subscription urgently.
-
Shea
commented
Yes please. Essential!
-
Grigori
commented
Currently there are no way to implement query based sync. Query based sync removed from SDK, Subscription not supported on GraphQL no way to synchronize partially with Realm
-
Omari
commented
+1
Having one neat graphql api is a great developer experience.There aren't alot of options for true serverless subscriptions. We're forced to build out a sophisticated stack in order to play ball. Not going with appSync.. more to the likes of App-Engine Flex with a tight grip on subscription management and load balancers. would much rather use realm.
-
Johnathan Hair
commented
Realtime data is becoming more of a standard in web and mobile applications. Polling is a workaround strategy but can become a big problem for your application depending on what data your are polling.
Subscriptions would put Realm higher on my list when considering a stack for new projects.
-
Marco
commented
Agree, this is the only thing preventing us to move away from Firestore
-
Gilad
commented
Please add this amazing feature!
-
Marco
commented
This would greatly benefit our use case. :+1
-
I Putu Yoga
commented
Looking forward to this feature, it will surely compete with appsync
-
Toshi
commented
I'm waiting for this feature!
Without it, you need to set up a separate node.js server somewhere else by yourself and that reduces the value of realm's great built-in graphql backend.
I think one of the use-cases where the nature of mongoDB will shine is an app that requires realtime feature. Subscription should be must-have in the Atlas-Realm world.