Skip to content

Atlas App Services

← MongoDB Feedback Engine

How can we improve the Atlas App Services?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

6 results found

  1. Terraform Provider

    It would be nice to be able to managed Realm Applications via Terraform, similar to how MongoDB Atlas can currently be managed via the mongodb_atlas from Terraform provider.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  3 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  2. Support for arrayFilters in Functions

    Can we add arrayFilters and other array update capabilities that already exist in MQL? Its is difficult to update arrays, and very easy to update an array in MQL in node.js for example.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  3 comments  ·  Functions  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  3. Allow manually disabled trigger to resume without resume token

    I am filing a feature request for the option to: Disable a trigger manually and be able to restart it without using a resume token (i.e. such that DB events that occurred while it was disabled will be ignored by the trigger, and it will simply start listening for new events upon restart).

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Triggers  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  4. Application Deployment in GCP

    Currently deployent is only available to AWS but Atlas allows deployment in GCP.

    We need to have deployment close to GCP for better performance consideration.

    7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Developer Experience  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

  5. Increase RealmReturn Body Max Size

    The maximum return body size of a realm webhook is 4MiB (4194304 bytes). That might seem enough for most applications but when dealing with massive amounts of data, e.g. timeseries data over years, that is a hard limitation.
    It requires the client to make many more requests that would be necessary.

    In our special case we want to return one whole year worth of data per request to make things easier for our clients (currently they can get 3 months).

    Given a 16MB Limit on a MongoDB Collection Document, this would seem like a sensable option for a limit if…

    5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    planned  ·  Drew responded

    Hi Marc – We have a ticket for this that’s near the top of the backlog and plan to increase the limit to 16MB in the near future.

  6. Triggers on DB level rather than single collections only

    Change streams support events on DB level or single collections, but triggers are limited to single collections. Which means that if we wanted to listen on changes in a generic way, we would have to setup a trigger for each collection and set them up with AWS EventBridge (and think about new triggers when new collections are generated).

    Given that the underlying tech (change streams) supports DB-level subscriptions, we would really like to see that on the UI, too.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Triggers  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
  • Don't see your idea?

Atlas App Services

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)