Skip to content

How can we improve the Atlas App Services?

← Atlas App Services

Add GraphQL Subscriptions

163 votes

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We’ll send you updates on this idea

Lukas shared this idea  ·   ·  Report…  ·  Admin →
How important is this to you?

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close

We're glad you're here

Please sign in to leave feedback
Signed in as (Sign out)
Close
Close
Submitting...
An error occurred while saving the comment
  • Nejc commented  ·   ·  Report

    Where we are with that?

  • Dev commented  ·   ·  Report

    is this still planned ? we really really need subscriptions pleeeeeasssseeeee!

  • Joshua commented  ·   ·  Report

    Hey guys, is there any update on this? Is this even a possibility for the roadmap?

  • Armando commented  ·   ·  Report

    Hi, this is essential for our new application.

    Please implement this as soon as possible, thanks.

  • Surender commented  ·   ·  Report

    Could somebody from the MongoDB team about the status. It is a showstopper for us. We tried to use watch() but it is unreliable and stops after sometime.

  • Ishan Jaiswal commented  ·   ·  Report

    Please add graphql subscriptions and this is something which makes graphql really unique and awesome.

  • Brian commented  ·   ·  Report

    GraphQL without subscriptions is just an organized HTTP.

  • Yuji commented  ·   ·  Report

    No need to discuss, it's the basic and essential advantage of graphql. Needed to support the graphql subscription urgently.

  • Shea commented  ·   ·  Report

    Yes please. Essential!

  • Grigori commented  ·   ·  Report

    Currently there are no way to implement query based sync. Query based sync removed from SDK, Subscription not supported on GraphQL no way to synchronize partially with Realm

  • Omari commented  ·   ·  Report

    +1
    Having one neat graphql api is a great developer experience.

    There aren't alot of options for true serverless subscriptions. We're forced to build out a sophisticated stack in order to play ball. Not going with appSync.. more to the likes of App-Engine Flex with a tight grip on subscription management and load balancers. would much rather use realm.

  • Johnathan commented  ·   ·  Report

    Realtime data is becoming more of a standard in web and mobile applications. Polling is a workaround strategy but can become a big problem for your application depending on what data your are polling.

    Subscriptions would put Realm higher on my list when considering a stack for new projects.

  • Marco commented  ·   ·  Report

    Agree, this is the only thing preventing us to move away from Firestore

  • Gilad commented  ·   ·  Report

    Please add this amazing feature!

  • Marco commented  ·   ·  Report

    This would greatly benefit our use case. :+1

  • I Putu Yoga commented  ·   ·  Report

    Looking forward to this feature, it will surely compete with appsync

  • Toshi commented  ·   ·  Report

    I'm waiting for this feature!

    Without it, you need to set up a separate node.js server somewhere else by yourself and that reduces the value of realm's great built-in graphql backend.

    I think one of the use-cases where the nature of mongoDB will shine is an app that requires realtime feature. Subscription should be must-have in the Atlas-Realm world.

  • Achid commented  ·   ·  Report

    This would be very helpful.

Atlas App Services: GraphQL API

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)