234 results found

1. Allow more Realm data source read preferences

   Need to be able to specify custom read preferences (e.g. tags) for Realm data sources, as I may want to segregate the load from my Realm apps with other operational load.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Experience  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. More Intuitive GUI for Relationship Modeling

   I know "Add Relationship" button works very well. However, you can check some of Headless CMS out there and learn from how they are letting users to handle relationship modeling.

   I think the one from Strapi is the best. It's like attached image.
   You can search on google image by "Strapi relation" and find more images.

   •  

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   started  ·  0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Compare Strings and ObjectIds in JSON Expressions

   We have a use-case where we need to compare an ObjectId on a document to the ObjectId of the user's custom data doc. However, because the ID of the user's custom data object is returned as a string and not as an ObjectId, there is no way to make this comparison without creating a function just to compare the ObjectId and the string. The overhead of invoking a function just to call toString on the ObjectId is going to be a major problem, especially because we need to make this comparison 5 times for every single operation on our most heavily trafficked collection.

   This could be easily solved by what should be a rather simple feature to add, an operator that could be used to compare an ObjectId to a string within JSON expressions.

   I think the best justification for this addition is that there are several situations where you simply cannot get an ID in ObjectId form as it is only provided as a string, like the ID on user custom data docs.

   We have a use-case where we need to compare an ObjectId on a document to the ObjectId of the user's custom data doc. However, because the ID of the user's custom data object is returned as a string and not as an ObjectId, there is no way to make this comparison without creating a function just to compare the ObjectId and the string. The overhead of invoking a function just to call toString on the ObjectId is going to be a major problem, especially because we need to make this comparison 5 times for every single operation on our most… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Allow hosting of frameworks like NextJS or Gatsby

   Currently the hosting only supports static sites. Would be great if it allowed for hosting apps built with frameworks like NextJS or Gatsby.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. Disable Sync

   A flag to enable/disable cloud sync on Fully-synchronized realms.

   This would be convenient if you're offering sync as a premium feature.

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Device Sync  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Password reset email customization

   Basic password reset email customization would be greatly appreciated when using the UserPassword auth provider. Short of fully customized emails, logo upload and basic verbiage editing would be an improvement.

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Developer Experience  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Add the ability to use a value to reference a database in a trigger

   It would be great if we could use values for the database reference in a trigger, instead of having to select a database from a drop-down.

   An actual use case:

   To be able to use Realm for our various staging areas, we have created multiple Realm apps. One for production, one for UAT, one for test, etc. Each of them pointing to the databases for their respective staging environment.

   We are using Github deployments, and we use a separate branch for each of the staging environments. So when something gets committed to the "deploy-test" branch, it gets to be deployed to the test Realm app. Thanks for adding that feature by the way!

   Now we face the following problem: The database reference is stored in the Github repository. We could work around this, by using values that are not included in the Github repository, but 'manually' added to the Realm app. These values can then be used in the Realm app, and the values can be different per staging environment. This works great for functions, but the problem is that this can't be used for triggers.

   So for now, we're replacing placeholder-values with an actual database name in the staging deployment branches using a script, which is error-prone, and we actually need to do a force-push to make it a bit workable in an automated way. Not something that we're loving at the moment.

   So basically we just one simple thing to have everything work super smooth! So please add the ability to use a value for a database reference in a trigger.

   It would be great if we could use values for the database reference in a trigger, instead of having to select a database from a drop-down.

   An actual use case:

   To be able to use Realm for our various staging areas, we have created multiple Realm apps. One for production, one for UAT, one for test, etc. Each of them pointing to the databases for their respective staging environment.

   We are using Github deployments, and we use a separate branch for each of the staging environments. So when something gets committed to the "deploy-test" branch, it gets to be deployed… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Triggers  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Allow modifying Sync permissions without having to terminate it. Maybe pause instead ?

   Currently only way to modify/add permissions to Sync is at the beginning or terminating it. It would great if we could modify/add them with Sync Running or at least only pause it to avoid downtime and deleting cache from sync.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Device Sync  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Add HTTPMethod column name in Realm HTTP Service webhooks table

   Please add the HTTP method name and other properties in the list of HTTP Service webhooks. See attachment

   •  

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Functions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. Actual API Documentation

    There is various documentation for the many Realm/Stitch SDKs but almost no information about the underlying API endpoints, this needs to change and we need some detailed docs for working with the API itself.

    I am trying to get an app running with the GraphQL API but have found working with the authentication APIs to handle auth tokens and sessions to be a bit of a nightmare. This page https://docs.mongodb.com/realm/graphql/authenticate/ has some useful information but doesn't even give the endpoints for logging out or explain how to properly handle the email sign up process using API endpoints in place of the SDK. This is particularly important when working in an isomorphic environment like NextJS, which is perfectly doable with plain APIs but currently impossible with the current Node/Browser SDKs.

    There is various documentation for the many Realm/Stitch SDKs but almost no information about the underlying API endpoints, this needs to change and we need some detailed docs for working with the API itself.

    I am trying to get an app running with the GraphQL API but have found working with the authentication APIs to handle auth tokens and sessions to be a bit of a nightmare. This page https://docs.mongodb.com/realm/graphql/authenticate/ has some useful information but doesn't even give the endpoints for logging out or explain how to properly handle the email sign up process using API endpoints in place of… more

    18 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Google Pubsub Client Support

    support Google Pubsub Client API's in functions

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Function JS Package Support  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Copy functions from one cluster to another

    It would be great if you could copy a Realm Service or Function from one cluster to another. I find myself having to open two tabs and coping the function code then checking all settings are the same etc.
    We would normally dev on a "test" cluster then copy Service functions over to "prod" cluster. Or am I missing something?

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. MongoDB Realm vs Realm

    Hi, I am an existing Realm/Realm Cloud user and am struggling to understand what the MongoDB Realm offering is and how it compares with the existing Realm/Realm Cloud solution.

    Is there any documentation that explains what the difference is between the two solutions and what if any migration is required.

    It's not clear whether the latest cocoa Realm database v5.1.0 is still compatible with Realm Cloud nor is it clear whether there is any plan to continue supporting the current Realm Cloud solution. A nice clear description would be much appreciated.

    Regards
    Duncan

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Developer Experience  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Realm UI Ability Changes to Github Repo

    Please add git integration for functions and 3rdParty HTTP services.
    Everything I make a change to a function and it is deployed, Realm tells me what the changes are but they are not pushed to my own Git repository

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Functions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Sumedha Mehta responded

    This was launched earlier last year -https://docs.mongodb.com/realm/manage-apps/deploy/automated/deploy-automatically-with-github/#make-changes-from-the-ui 

15. Github Deploy

    When deploying from a Github commit, can you make the Realm files only update what is being committed? It seems like Realm is updating all files, which is taking forever when you have a bunch of functions, along with Hosting files, which in my case is a good bit.

    If I go directly into the UI and update a function from there, the Deploy happens fairly quick. But, as soon as I commit from Github, that function gets updated by what is in my Github Repo, which in this case, would overwrire what I just did in the UI.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Developer Experience  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Ability to query datalake / online archive

    The new online archive is awesome.

    What would be even better is if we could query the data it moves to S3 as part of our stitch/realm functions.

    Thanks

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Configure rate limit

    It would be nice to be able to configure rate-limiting to prevent DDoS, scraping or unwanted requests that could highly increase the cost of MongoDB Realms

    58 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Disable Realm

    It would be great to be able to disable a realm without deleting it. Currently, this is possible by unlinking the cluster or exporting the realm and deleting it. Both of which create more work when firing it back up.

    It would also be amazing to be able to tie that in with billing alerts. Say I would rather my app crash than pay more than a certain amount because of Realm usage.

    In essence, I'm asking for an "always free" Realm that just disables itself when the free tier has been hit so that I can be 100% certain that I wouldn't be charged. The realm wouldn't disappear and could be turned back on either the next month or if I chose to accept the charges for additional resources. This would allow me to gauge my usage in the first few months without the worry of being charged.

    It would be great to be able to disable a realm without deleting it. Currently, this is possible by unlinking the cluster or exporting the realm and deleting it. Both of which create more work when firing it back up.

    It would also be amazing to be able to tie that in with billing alerts. Say I would rather my app crash than pay more than a certain amount because of Realm usage.

    In essence, I'm asking for an "always free" Realm that just disables itself when the free tier has been hit so that I can be 100% certain… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Support TypeScript

    I know this is probably a very complex feature, but I'd like to work with TypeScript when writing functions.
    Some stretch goals:
    - full integration with VSCode so we no longer have to use the web editor
    - add support for testing functions (through CI/CD)

    105 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Functions  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. on premise solution

    Allow MongoDB to be used for on-premise solutions to offer early on integration or govcloud support for Realm.

    34 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  App Services General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close