Skip to content

Atlas Search

160 results found

  1. Add Atlas Search for Enterprise Advanced

    Due to customer/project constraints, I need to have the ability to use $search to query millions of historical data records with regex and wildcards queries at real-time, on a Enterprise Advanced environment.

    The data cannot be exported to Atlas and it cannot depend on Internet connection, so the functionality must be On-Premises only.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Sort by a specific array index

    When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to index/sort on a specific array index (e.g. foo.0.bar). I do this because the search results grid in our UI only has room to show the first foo.bar result, so it doesn't make sense visually to sort by additional objects which the user can't see.

    Since the new Atlas Search Sort syntax looks the same, I was hoping to do that with it as well, but it doesn't seem possible.

    Example:

    [
      { "xyzzy": "xyzzy",
        "foo": [ { "bar": "A" } ] },
    
      { "xyzzy": "xyzzy",
        "foo": [
    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Ability to return all documents in a collection

    I need to return all documents in a collection while boosting certain results which match my search criteria.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. add a setting to ignore the corpus term frequency for score calculation

    indexOption:docs omits per document frequencies, but it still uses the corpus frequency.

    it would be good to have a setting to ignore the corpus frequency as well

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Atlas full text search should support searching all field types

    Atlas full text search should support searching all fields types including text, dates, numbers and booleans.

    Atlas full text search at present supports searching in text values only. e.g. Searching for "2022" will not pick up documents that contain 2022 in the number fields.

    The functionality in it's current form does not have any way of searching for a given string value (which can be numeric, boolean or part of a date).

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. enable $and operator for multiple words in a search term (not only $or)

    It seems a commonly needed ability to decrease the amount of results from a multi-word search query instead of expanding it, since the default operator for every word is $or. If there could be a built-in $and option it will be great. Thank you.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. RBAC for Atlas Search

    Atlas Search Indexes can only be managed via MongoDB credentials (Terraform or API calls), with required role "Project Data Access Admin" (see https://docs.atlas.mongodb.com/reference/api/fts-indexes-create-one/#required-roles ). It would be great if we could create/delete search indexes using database credentials, similarly to regular indexes.

    Because of that constraint, we need to provision dedicated apikey for our application ; in order to create the relevant search indexes. However, providing "Project Data Access Admin" is too much of a security risk - considering the power of such role.

    Would it be possible to have dedicated "Atlas Search Admin" role which would allow creation / updating…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. wildcard path support for range operator

    Currently wildcard path can be constructed to 4 operator(text, phrase, wildcard and regex). Some use cases will be there to use the wildcard path for numeric which can be used by range operator

    { a : { "6578ghg" : { value : "not 55" } } }
    { a : { "9578uhg" : { value : 55 } } }

    Above 2 document if we have dynamic mapping of search index and below query cannot be used as range does not support wildcard in path:

    db.dates.aggregate([ { $search :{ index:"synonyms", compound:{filter:[{text:{query:"55",path:{wildcard:"metadata.*.value"}}},{range:{gte:55,lte:55,path:{wildcard:"metadata.*.value"}}}]}}}])
    

    Is there any plans/restriction for adding wildcard path support…

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Autocomplete with `fuzzy` scores all results as `1`

    Using autocomplete with the fuzzy operator returns results, but they are scored all with the same value (1). This has been reported a couple times in the developer forum as well:

    https://developer.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/fuzzy-autocomplete-score/13341/4

    https://developer.mongodb.com/community/forums/t/trying-to-understand-atlas-search-autocomplete-result/13819

    This can make it difficult to process and rank results on the client side, especially for high volumes of returned documents. It would be helpful if autocomplete + fuzzy would support relative scoring.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Support unstructured text entity recognition

    We have unstructured text and would like Atlas Search to detect important entities so that we can use them for relevance and ranking

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Per-shard scaling of search nodes

    With the (somewhat recent) functionality of "asymmetric sharding", i.e.:
    - https://registry.terraform.io/providers/mongodb/mongodbatlas/latest/docs/guides/advanced-cluster-new-sharding-schema
    - https://registry.terraform.io/providers/mongodb/mongodbatlas/latest/docs/resources/advanced_cluster

    we are considering an architecture where we isolate specific collections or sets of collections on specific shards.

    However we are also interested in using Atlas Search for these collections. We would like to use dedicated search nodes, but because of the above architecture, we would only need those search nodes on specific shards.

    Because of this: for cost reasons, we would like the ability to scale search nodes for a shard independently, similar to how the electable nodes can be scaled independently.

    That is, we would like…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Include product versions in Atlas Search release notes

    I am creating this feedback idea in customer behalf.

    Customer suggests if adding product version numbers, for Atlas Search Release Notes pages. The page currently contains release dates, which does not provide sufficient information to debug Atlas maintenance upgrade execution plans.

    Example: The release referred to 18 September 2024 Release on the main page https://www.mongodb.com/docs/atlas/atlas-search/changelog/#18-september-2024-release is related to Atlas seach (mongot) version v.1.40.4.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Allow type 'token' in embeddedDocument

    Currently, string fields in an embedded document may be indexed as type 'string' using an analyzer, e.g. lucene.keyword. It is not possible, to index a string field in an embedded document as type 'token'.

    Indexing as type 'token' is relevant for using a 'range'-operator in a query or to sort by a string field. This is would be very useful when working with sortable strings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Increase the disk size limit of 3.2 TB on Search tier.

    Atlas search tier limits the disk size to 3.2 TB even on the highest search tier S110.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Compatibility with shard reduction

    We are using Atlas Search (as a sidecar process) and aren't able to reduce the number of our shards without causing downtime to Atlas Search. A shard mechanism that's compatible with Atlas Search is necessary for us to optimize our costs.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. expose json schema when doing dynamic mapping

    It would be really helpful to see the json schema when doing dynamic mapping so I’ll be able to alter it according to my needs. Building everything from scratch takes a lot of time.

    I use the json editor. I want to index a lot of fields and some of the fields contains arrays and documents that I want to index as well. Writing the schema to index all the fields takes a lot of time. When I do dynamic indexing I know that you have the schema in the backend. It will be very helpful to expose this schema…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Text Analysis for Field Mappings

    Show how an indexed document and query terms get analyzed to produce tokens based on my field mapping configuration.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Allow indexing of synthetic fields

    In order to work around some of the inherent limitations of the Atlas Search capabilities, it would be very useful if we could define and index arbitrary synthetic fields using any normal MongoDB functions & operators. All other Atlas Search capabilities (query, sort, etc.) should support these synthetic fields the same as any other.

    This could possibly be implemented with a new field type and a custom analyzer that supports an aggregate pipeline on the input document and returning the field as its output. This is just an idea, there may be better ways to do it.

    {
      "mappings": {
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Data type coercion when document field type doesn't match index field type

    When a document field type doesn't match the index field type, it seems to be indexed as "blank" and won't match anything. Many data types are readily convertible between type representations. It would be great if Atlas Search could do that for us and would open up richer functionality by allowing us to use operators/analyzers/etc. on types that don't normally support them.

    My particular use case is to allow searching & sorting on numbers stored as strings. When creating indexes and sorting with "normal" queries, it is possible to sort numbers stored as strings by their numerical ordering rather than…

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?

Atlas Search

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base