Skip to content

Björn

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 400 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    started  ·  50 comments  ·  Atlas » IAM  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Björn commented  · 

    I voted for this but I came to a point where I have to say: it would be much more useful for an organization like ours (regulated) to have policies on an organization level that prevent unwanted settings espacially in App Services (like creating endpoints or allow anonymous authentication or just creating ip access lists .... there are tons of such settings) ... so if I have to decide between having fine grained permissions or policies to prevent unwanted/mistakenly made settings I would go with the second. By the way it seems that Atlas has to do some heavy lifting with the fine grained permissions compared to the time this is an open and whished feature ... ;-)

    Björn supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    3 comments  ·  Atlas » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Björn supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Björn commented  · 

    This would be very useful so we do not have to struggle with fine grained permissions / roles on the control plane but simply have a policy mechanism for the whole organization. Especially in the context of App Services where everybody has to be Project Owner to do something useful it seems to be a simple solution to just prevent unwanted features (like not allowing anonymous authentication or whitelisting of ips not known to the enterprise or disabling ssl or or or ... there seems to be some points where this can made thinks easier for enterprises or regulated companies like us.

  3. 35 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    8 comments  ·  Atlas » Other  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Björn supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Björn commented  · 

    Would appreciate a streaming solution for the audit logs to Splunk as well. The solution mentioned by Andrew (push-based integration for logs to S3) would work for us as well. So where can I upvote for this solution ;-)

Feedback and Knowledge Base