4 results found
An error occurred while saving the commentSergei commented
Jumping back in after I thought that this link was no longer present.
To elaborate more about the use case:
Currently we don't see the actual percentage of wiredTiger cache usage in Atlas, only the amount of its utilization in GB's.
We had already few incidents of bad instance performances due to critical (>90%) levels of cache utilization.
Displaying this type of information and metric will assist us in catching these issues before they snowball and affect our system. In addition, if the matter is related to natural growth and workload, we would know that it is time to upgrade the cluster to its next tier.
SergeiSergei shared this idea ·