Jan

My feedback

  1. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Atlas » Alerts  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jan supported this idea  · 
  2. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Database  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jan shared this idea  · 
  3. 205 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under review  ·  25 comments  ·  Atlas » IAM  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jan supported this idea  · 
  4. 91 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    10 comments  ·  Atlas » Autoscaling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jan supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Jan commented  · 

    This is a really good suggestion. Scaling up and down based on custom rules and times would ne a huge improvement.

    For example one hour to scale up is kind of longand and for us usually it is based on IO load and not so much CPU.

    For now cluster scaling seems to be more targeted at workloads with different CPU loads, but there is also definitely a need for IO based scaling.

    For example while IO load is low M20 is sufficient, when it increases M30 with provisioned IOPS at different levels. That is something we would like to automate instead of performing manually.

  5. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Atlas » Autoscaling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Jan supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base