Database
43 results found
-
multiple centersphere as a geometry for geowithin
im looking at one of my queries that a system regularly runs and some times we look for records that are within up to 250 different centerspheres, i wornder if we could enable, like geowithin has the ability to support multiple poligons, we could enable multiple centerspheres ,
$match: {{'location':{
"$geoWithin" : {
"$centerSphere" : [[ 14.4321, -9.4321], 2.5232135647961246e-05]
}
}}, {'location':{
"$geoWithin" : {
"$centerSphere" : [[ 14.4321, -9.4321], 2.5232135647961246e-05]
}
}}, ...}
we could do :
```
$match: {'location':{
"$geoWithin" : {
"$centerSpheres" : [
[[ 14.4321, -9.4321], 2.5232135647961246e-05] ,
[[ 14.4321, -9.4321], 2.5232135647961246e-05],
...
]} }}
1 vote -
$populate stage
Please provide a $populate stage that allows to resolve single referenced documents.
Internally it could use the combination of $lookup and $unwind:Related:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37793844/mongodb-how-to-resolve-dbref-on-client-side
1 vote -
Allow configuration of 100mb memory limit per aggregation pipeline stage
In this old thread from 2016 (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mongodb-user/LCeFZZRz5EY) it was asked whether there was a way to increase the 100mb in memory limit of each stage of an aggregation pipeline. The responses centered around two points:
- If too much memory is used per aggregation pipeline stage then it will reduce performance for the overall MongoDB database, impacting other queries negatively.
- You can set allowDiskUse: true and revert to performing these pipeline stages on disk when they exceed 100mb.
I believe this subject needs to be revisited for the following reasons:
- “Too much memory” is very subjective, and the 100mb…
26 votes
- Don't see your idea?