Welcome to the new MongoDB Feedback Portal!
{Improvement: "Your idea"}
We’ve upgraded our system to better capture and act on your feedback.
Your feedback is meaningful and helps us build better products.
We’ve upgraded our feedback system to better capture, track, and act on your feedback. Here’s what you need to know:
|
What problem are you trying to solve? Focus on the what and why of the need you have, not the how you'd like it solved. |
|
|
What would you like to see happen? Describe the desired outcome or enhancement. |
|
|
Why is this important to you or your team? Explain how the request adds value or solves a business need. |
|
What steps, if any, are you taking today to manage this problem? |
Hi Barnabás,
Thanks for raising this. We need a bit more detail before we can evaluate the issue and route it to the right team.
Can you clarify where you are seeing this “oplogs.rs finder” issue?
What product or environment is this in?
Atlas, Ops Manager, Cloud Manager, a self-managed MongoDB deployment, or another tool?
If this is in Atlas, what page or workflow are you using?
If this is a shell/query workflow, are you querying
local.oplog.rsdirectly?What “extremely slow” means in practice
How long does the finder take to return results?
Is it consistently slow, or only for certain clusters, time ranges, namespaces, or workloads?
What “no results” means
What result did you expect to see?
Can you share an example query/filter, namespace, cluster, deployment type, or time window where this happens?
What impact this is having
Is this blocking investigation of a production issue, making debugging harder, or creating a supportability gap?
How often do you need to use this workflow?
What outcome you want
Faster search over
local.oplog.rsdata?More reliable results?
Better filtering or discoverability?
A different diagnostic workflow entirely?
The current title gives us a useful signal, but we need to understand the surface area, expected behavior, and impact before we can size or route this appropriately.